As an east coat Jew, there are at all times going to be a number of points for me which veer into neurosis. The existence of blueberry bagels. Individuals who eat pizza with a knife and fork. Gradual walkers. However outdoors of those there’s one but unsolved query that I battle with greater than others: what’s a greater phrase than pal to explain somebody with whom you’re acquainted (and positively disposed in direction of), however haven’t spent sufficient time collectively or gotten to know deeply sufficient to really name them “pal?”
Most individuals inform me I ought to simply name them “pal” however this isn’t proper for me. A pal is somebody I really feel like I do know. The place the connection is of comparable bidirectional depth and dedication. A friendship is a vouch.
By saying everyone seems to be a pal you lose the intimacy (and expectations) for what a friendship really entails. The only fallback is acquaintance. Right here’s how that usually goes, most frequently in an expert context:
“Hey Hunter, [other person] says you’re associates?”
“Nicely I’d name them an acquaintance. But when I spent extra time with them I wager we’d be associates.”
To me that feels acceptable, however there’s a bizarre asymmetry the place more often than not the individual I’m calling an acquaintance is looking me a pal after which it will get bizarre.
So right here’s my query/request for you:
What do you name somebody who you’ve had some quantity of interplay with, even perhaps share some curiosity group/social circles/constructed some familiarity with each other, however aren’t but “friendship” stage shut?
My necessities are:
- Genderless time period
- Can work in a enterprise/skilled setting
- Widespread sufficient to be understood by 95%+ of individuals
- Has no baggage that makes it seem to be I’m critiquing the opposite one that thinks we’re associates
You’ve my gratitude!
