Google’s John Mueller defined what he would contemplate being a search high quality subject, inflicting rating points particular to Google contemplating the location not “high quality.” John stated on Twitter “to me, high quality points are issues that customers would contemplate to be problematic.”
He added that technical points that customers don’t see possible wouldn’t be thought of a high quality subject by Google. John stated, “unhealthy rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? Most likely not.”
John additionally stated it’s common to see each high quality and technical points on the identical website however that doesn’t imply the 2 are the identical. John wrote, “each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily extensive fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a high quality or a technical subject?).” “If a website has obvious points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite facet will not make an enormous impression,” he added.
Listed here are the tweets associated to this, so you possibly can see it in context:
.@johnmu are search engine optimization technical points high quality points? I’ve seen articles that say you stated they had been and that you simply stated they weren’t lol
Simply attempting to get clarification.
— Kristine Schachinger (@schachin) September 21, 2022
Each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily extensive fields, there’s all the time some overlap (eg, is velocity a high quality or a technical subject?). If a website has obvious points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite facet will not make an enormous impression.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
It is determined by what you contemplate a high quality subject. To me, high quality points are issues that customers would contemplate to be problematic. Is a foul rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? Most likely not.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
And considerably associated however in a special thread, John wrote “Simply because a web site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search outcome for customers.”
Simply because a web site is technically legitimate doesn’t suggest it is a helpful & related search outcome for customers.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
So technical points and high quality points are completely different, based on John Mueller of Google.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
